Sunday, August 10, 2025
Smart Again
  • Home
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Law & Defense
  • Community
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Smart Again
  • Home
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Law & Defense
  • Community
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Smart Again
No Result
View All Result
Home Trending

America’s (lack of) separation between church and state, explained

March 16, 2025
in Trending
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0 0
A A
0
America’s (lack of) separation between church and state, explained
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


A Vox reader asks: If we have “separation of church and state,” why do we give religious schools tax exemption? How come religious schools get government funding? Why was Trump allowed to campaign on religion and publicly sell Bibles? Why does it say “In God We Trust” on our money? Why is “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance?

The concept of “separation of church and state” isn’t quite as ironclad as you may think.

The First Amendment prohibits laws “respecting an establishment of religion,” a provision that many Americans believe should create a firm wall of separation between church and state. But the Constitution also does not enforce itself. In the United States, we rely on judges and Supreme Court justices to determine what the Constitution means and to apply it to individual cases.

That means that the amount of church and state separation in the United States tends to ebb and flow depending on who sits on the Supreme Court.

The idea that the government should play no role in funding or encouraging religion probably hit its high water mark in the mid-20th century. As the Supreme Court said in Everson v. Board of Education (1947), “no tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion.” That suggests that it is unconstitutional to fund any religious activity with money collected from taxes.

Beginning in the Nixon administration, however, the Court started to move steadily rightward. Nixon filled four of the nine seats on the Supreme Court, though most of his nominees were relative moderates compared to the increasingly ideological justices chosen by Presidents Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump.

Today, the Republican Party has a 6-3 supermajority on the Supreme Court, and when church and state cases have come before them, all six of those Republicans have behaved exactly how you would expect members of a political movement closely aligned with conservative Christianity to behave. That means that the Court is now actively tearing down whatever barrier used to exist between church and state.

Why is religion in public schools and on American money?

Let’s start with Carson v. Makin (2022), in which the Republican justices concluded that, if a state offers vouchers to help some students pay for private education, it must allow those vouchers to be spent on religious schools. The Court also recently announced that it will hear two other cases, out of Oklahoma, which are likely to require states to fund religious charter schools.

If you’re looking for an explanation for this shift, you will not find it in the Constitution, as the text of the First Amendment has not changed. You will find it instead within the shifting personnel within the Supreme Court.

The question of whether taxpayers must fund religious schools is a hotly contested one and is likely to hinge on which political party controls the Supreme Court for the foreseeable future. But it’s worth acknowledging that there are people of faith in both political parties. Americans of all political persuasions care a great deal about their churches, mosques, temples, and synagogues.

Indeed, that may explain why Trump — who, as a private citizen campaigning for office, had a First Amendment right to say anything he wanted to say about religion — chose to center religion in his campaign and even sell Bibles. The Bible is literally the most popular book in the world, and millions of American voters look fondly upon politicians who align themselves with it.

And this reality also shapes how, say, US tax policy functions.

There’s never been a serious effort to strip religious charities, including houses of worship, of their tax-exempt status. And there probably never will be, because the people who attend those houses of worship are voters, and they would likely rise up in outrage if such a thing were attempted.

That said, the Constitution has also long been understood to forbid religious discrimination. So these tax exemptions must be offered equally to people of all faiths. If a church can claim a tax exemption, a mosque must also be able to claim that same exemption on the same terms.

Similarly, there are some largely ceremonial or symbolic nods to religion — such as the use of the phrase “In God we Trust” on US coins, or the opening of many legislative sessions with a prayer — that, as the Supreme Court said in Marsh v. Chambers (1983), are “deeply embedded in the history and tradition of this country,” a history and tradition that — especially early on — was intertwined with Christianity. The courts have left many of these symbolic acknowledgments of religion in place, in part because attempting to dislodge them is unlikely to be successful.

To understand why, consider a controversy that briefly flared up during the second Bush administration. In 2002, a federal appeals court ruled that the inclusion of the words “under God” in a public school’s daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance violates the Constitution. That decision triggered a massive backlash among members of Congress, including a bipartisan proposal to amend the Constitution to permit “a reference to God in the Pledge of Allegiance or on United States currency.”

This controversy died down after the Supreme Court ruled, in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow (2004), that the appeals court never had jurisdiction to issue its decision in the first place. But the whole incident stands as a warning to Americans who want to drive symbolic references to religion out of government altogether. While there may be plausible legal arguments for this position, law is ultimately subordinate to politics, and those politics favor religion — especially Christianity.



Source link

Tags: AmericaschurchExplain It to MeexplainedExplainerslackPolicyPoliticsseparationstate
Previous Post

Were companies ever serious about DEI?

Next Post

‘It Got Everything’: Oklahoma Residents Who Escaped Fires Brace for Losses

Related Posts

Hegseth Reposted Video From Christian Nationalist Pastor Who Thinks Women Should Not Vote
Trending

Hegseth Reposted Video From Christian Nationalist Pastor Who Thinks Women Should Not Vote

August 9, 2025
Questions To Find Out If MAGA Voters  Realize Trump Is Failing And Lying.
Trending

Questions To Find Out If MAGA Voters  Realize Trump Is Failing And Lying.

August 9, 2025
Dean Cain becomes an ICE agent amid Hollywood backlash
Trending

Dean Cain becomes an ICE agent amid Hollywood backlash

August 9, 2025
The Air Force Is Buying Cybertrucks For Target Practice
Trending

The Air Force Is Buying Cybertrucks For Target Practice

August 9, 2025
The brutal trade-off that will decide the future of food
Trending

The brutal trade-off that will decide the future of food

August 9, 2025
Trump escalates his racist attacks on Black Americans
Trending

Trump escalates his racist attacks on Black Americans

August 9, 2025
Next Post
‘It Got Everything’: Oklahoma Residents Who Escaped Fires Brace for Losses

‘It Got Everything’: Oklahoma Residents Who Escaped Fires Brace for Losses

‘Dead’ Ned Johnson Turns Out To Be Very Much Alive

'Dead' Ned Johnson Turns Out To Be Very Much Alive

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
How commerce became our most powerful tool against global poverty

How commerce became our most powerful tool against global poverty

April 12, 2025
Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s spy chief makes sense, actually

Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s spy chief makes sense, actually

February 21, 2025
New Lawsuit Challenges Legality of Trump’s Sending Migrants to Guantánamo

New Lawsuit Challenges Legality of Trump’s Sending Migrants to Guantánamo

March 1, 2025
Relax. “The Residence” only shows murder in this White House

Relax. “The Residence” only shows murder in this White House

March 20, 2025
What to Know About the Only US Military Base in Greenland

What to Know About the Only US Military Base in Greenland

March 26, 2025
J. Bennett Johnston, 92, Dies; Senator Helped Shape U.S. Energy Policy

J. Bennett Johnston, 92, Dies; Senator Helped Shape U.S. Energy Policy

March 26, 2025
“They stole an election”: Former Florida senator found guilty in “ghost candidates” scandal

“They stole an election”: Former Florida senator found guilty in “ghost candidates” scandal

0
The Hawaii senator who faced down racism and ableism—and killed Nazis

The Hawaii senator who faced down racism and ableism—and killed Nazis

0
The murder rate fell at the fastest-ever pace last year—and it’s still falling

The murder rate fell at the fastest-ever pace last year—and it’s still falling

0
Trump used the site of the first assassination attempt to spew falsehoods

Trump used the site of the first assassination attempt to spew falsehoods

0
MAGA church plans to raffle a Trump AR-15 at Second Amendment rally

MAGA church plans to raffle a Trump AR-15 at Second Amendment rally

0
Tens of thousands are dying on the disability wait list

Tens of thousands are dying on the disability wait list

0
Hegseth Reposted Video From Christian Nationalist Pastor Who Thinks Women Should Not Vote

Hegseth Reposted Video From Christian Nationalist Pastor Who Thinks Women Should Not Vote

August 9, 2025
Labubu mania is here and even burglars are buying in

Labubu mania is here and even burglars are buying in

August 9, 2025
Questions To Find Out If MAGA Voters  Realize Trump Is Failing And Lying.

Questions To Find Out If MAGA Voters  Realize Trump Is Failing And Lying.

August 9, 2025
Dean Cain becomes an ICE agent amid Hollywood backlash

Dean Cain becomes an ICE agent amid Hollywood backlash

August 9, 2025
The Air Force Is Buying Cybertrucks For Target Practice

The Air Force Is Buying Cybertrucks For Target Practice

August 9, 2025
Texas Democrats Change The Rules And Republicans Are Shocked

Texas Democrats Change The Rules And Republicans Are Shocked

August 9, 2025
Smart Again

Stay informed with Smart Again, the go-to news source for liberal perspectives and in-depth analysis on politics, social justice, and more. Join us in making news smart again.

CATEGORIES

  • Community
  • Law & Defense
  • Politics
  • Trending
  • Uncategorized
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • Hegseth Reposted Video From Christian Nationalist Pastor Who Thinks Women Should Not Vote
  • Labubu mania is here and even burglars are buying in
  • Questions To Find Out If MAGA Voters  Realize Trump Is Failing And Lying.
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Smart Again.
Smart Again is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Law & Defense
  • Community
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Smart Again.
Smart Again is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Go to mobile version